On Sun 2017-07-16 12:44:04 +0300, Wartan Hachaturow wrote: > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 01:23:35PM +0200, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > >> > Not to mention the security & troubleshooting applications which >> > require insight into the cryptostream on the wire. >> >> I asked for examples of regulations that specifically require plaintext >> from the network. > > Some countries has got that kind of requirements in the lawful > interception context, in the sense that monitoring is explicitly > required to be fully passive.
Could you point me (and the list) to those requirements, please? More specificity than "some countries" would be a useful contribution to this discussion. > However, this mostly means "network equipment that supports some kind > of encryption on the link should be able to pass the traffic in > plaintext for monitoring purposes". Is this quote taken from a specific regulatory context? or do the quotation marks indicate paraphrasing or something else? Regards, --dkg _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls