On 08/04/2017 07:50 AM, Sean Turner wrote: > At our IETF 99 session, there was support in the room to adopt > draft-huitema-tls-sni-encryption [0]. We need to confirm this support on the > list so please let the list know whether you support adoption of the draft > and are willing to review/comment on the draft before 20170818. If you > object to its adoption, please let us know why. >
It is before 20170818, and so I make my reply to the call for adoption now. I think that the WG should discuss this topic and produce a document with it, but I am not convinced that this document, as it stands, is a good starting point for a product of the WG. As has already been discussed, it is a bit strange to have normative language in the catalog of known attacks, but removing those is easy and also uncontroversial. That said, my main reason for believing that changes are needed before this is a good starting point for a WG document is that it does not present itself as a single cohesive solution, but rather a choice. This, of course, has also already been noted, but I will note that I also prefer to have the choice resolved before adopting a WG document. (It is possible, of course, that the choice of the WG will be that both flavors are necessary, or even something not yet included.) That said, I am happy to review and comment on drafts in this area as the WG discusses options and settles on a consensus choice. -Ben
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
