On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB/Cambridge, UK) <thomas.foss...@nokia.com> wrote: > Do you think this is likely to cause havoc? Or, in your experience, > middle-boxes tend to not interfere after the TLS channel is up?
I expect so. There was a move, early in TLS 1.3, to drop the superfluous version in the record header. I think that was reverted for the same reason, although I don't recall exactly what data that was based on. (I'm also assuming that this is much more useful for DTLS than TLS since you know that each packet will have a record header in it. With TLS, the kernel might keep retransmitting some part of the half-connection's data that doesn't include the connection id at all.) Cheers AGL -- Adam Langley a...@imperialviolet.org https://www.imperialviolet.org _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
