Adam Langley <a...@imperialviolet.org> writes: >Obviously I'm not adverse to using the occasional, non-IANA code point. But >they need to be picked randomly and outside the dense, IANA area. Otherwise, >this is certain to happen in short order.
The story behind this one was that I was asked to defer publication of -LTS until the IANA registry draft got published (and I'm still waiting). In the meantime implementers needed to use some value for deployments, and 26 was the next unused value so that got used under the assumption that if everything else was also waiting for the registry draft to be published it wouldn't get grabbed away suddenly. It's now been in use for about two years so there is quite a bit of precedent for its use by LTS. Peter. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
