On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 09:20:16PM -0700, Joseph Salowey wrote: > 1. Do you support the working group taking on future work on a pinning > mechanism (based on the modifications or another approach)?
Yes with a caveat: I don't much care whether pinning work gets done as an individual submission, as a TLS WG work item, or some other WG's work item. > 2. Do you support the reserved bytes in the revision for a future pinning > mechanism? Yes. I prefer just the two bytes we asked for, but I'm also happy with the optional up-to-255-byte hole. I'm not at all interested in more complex holes. > 3. Do you support the proof of denial of existence text in the revision? Yes. > 4. Do you support the new and improved security considerations? Yes. Nico -- _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
