Hiya, On 14/02/2019 19:26, Salz, Rich wrote: >> That just says you can't report it as successful. > > "MUST NOT surface" seems like bad phrasing then. > > > * I'm blanking on better wording. I wanted to keep the wording > independent of whether your TLS stack knows how to open transport connections > or not, which changes things a bunch, which constrained things a bit. Any > thoughts? > > Represent instead of surface?
I'd be fine if the PR wasn't fully wordsmithed, e.g. I've often written drafts that have text like "[[this needs more right, "surface" isn't quite right]]" - there will, after all, be a -04 and so on when we can fix that. Cheers, S.
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
