> On 26 Mar 2019, at 9:06, Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net> wrote: > > This needs more space for each flag. 8 bits is a pretty small space. If you > are concerned with the size of the result, we have some variable-length > integer encodings you could try.
Ah, the beautiful variable length encodings. Like: - 0x00 - 0xBF - for standards-action allocations - 0xC0,0x00 - 0xEF,0xFF - for non-standards track - 0xF0,0x00 - 0xFF,0xFF - for private use among consenting parties. Are we really worried that we’re going to have more than 255 optional features for TLS? _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
