I'm not in favour of adoption or discussion of this draft on the WG list. I'm also against publishing it in the IETF stream. It's a waste of everyone's time. I hope the chairs take the opportunity to close this thread soon.
On 24/07/2019 04:13, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > the Independent stream of the RFC series is purpose-built for > individual commentary on the consequences of a particular standard Yes. If the authors want an RFC for this text they ought contact the ISE. Cheers, S.
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
