Hi, I think it's a good starting point. I support adoption.
Regards, Valery. > At IETF 105, ekr presented cTLS (Compact TLS) [0][1][2] to both the TLS WG > and the LAKE BOF, which is now a chartered WG [3]. After some discussions, > the ADs suggested [4] that the TLS WG consider whether this draft be adopted > as a TLS WG item. LAKE could then later specify/refer/adopt/profile it, as > appropriate. The authors revised cTLS and presented the revised draft at IETF > 106 [5]. At IETF 106 there was support for adoption of cTLS as a WG item. To > confirm this on the list: if you believe that the TLS WG should not adopt this as > a WG item, then please let the chairs know by posting a message to the TLS list > by 2359 UTC 13 December 2019 (and say why). > > NOTE: > : If the consensus is that this draft should be adopted as a WG item, then this > will necessarily result in a WG rechartering discussions. We would have gotten > to this rechartering discussion anyway now that DTLS 1.3 is progressing out of > the WG. > > Thanks, > Chris, Joe, and Sean > > [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/slides-105-tls-sessa-ctls/ > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-ctls/ > [2] https://github.com/ekr/draft-rescorla-tls-ctls > [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-ctls/ > [4] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/kACwW7PXrmTRa4PvXQ0TA34xCv > k > [5] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/slides-106-tls-compact- > tls-13-00.pdf > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
