I support adoption. We can sort out the few tiny issues remaining in the working group.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019, at 14:56, Sean Turner wrote: > At IETF 106 there was support for adoption of "Batch Signing for TLS" > [0] as a WG item. To confirm this on the list: if you believe that the > TLS WG should not adopt this as a WG item, then please let the chairs > know by posting a message to the TLS list by 2359 UTC 13 December 2019 > (and say why). > > NOTE: > : If the consensus is that this draft should be adopted as a WG item, > then this will necessarily result in a WG rechartering discussions. We > would have gotten to this rechartering discussion anyway now that DTLS > 1.3 is progressing out of the WG. > > Thanks, > Chris, Joe, and Sean > > [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-davidben-tls-batch-signing/ > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
