I am also in favor of advancing this document, for similar reasons to Hannes.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 2:56 AM Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 7:30 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am in favor of adopting this document as a starting point for further >> work. It fits nicely into the work on cTLS >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: TLS <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Sean Turner >> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2019 6:29 AM >> To: TLS List <[email protected] <[email protected]>> >> Subject: [TLS] Adoption call for draft-rescorla-tls-semistatic-dh >> >> At IETF 106 there was support for adoption of "Semi-Static Diffie-Hellman >> Key Establishment" for TLS 1.3 [0] as a WG item. To confirm this on the >> list: if you believe that the TLS WG should not adopt this as a WG item, >> then please let the chairs know by posting a message to the TLS list by >> 2359 >> UTC 13 December 2019 (and say why). >> >> NOTE: >> : If the consensus is that this draft should be adopted as a WG item, then >> this will necessarily result in a WG rechartering discussions. We would >> have gotten to this rechartering discussion anyway now that DTLS 1.3 is >> progressing out of the WG. >> >> Thanks, >> Joe and Sean >> >> [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rescorla-tls-semistatic-dh/ >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> >> _______________________________________________ >> TLS mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >> > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
