Hi Hanno, On 06/04/2020, 12:19, "Hanno Becker" <hanno.bec...@arm.com> wrote: > Thus, in a nutshell, leaving the question of whether ACKs should be > buffered or not on the receiver to the implementor, leads to > interoperability issues.
I'm not sure this strictly qualifies as an interop issue. At a subtle level it is, in the sense that the signals coming from one side don't the same exact semantics when observed from the peer point of view, but that doesn't result in an interop problem at the macro level. It does make the reliability scheme suboptimal and maybe even grossly inefficient in some cases and may have disruptive potential on the network, agreed. But the overall "lost in translation" effect depends greatly on the resources available to the endpoints as well as the network path rather than the inner logics of the ACKing scheme. cheers IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
