I oppose adoption. While there could be some minor benefit in documenting the uses and abuses seen when mitm'ing tls, I doubt that the effort to ensure a balanced document is at all worthwhile. The current draft is too far from what it'd need to be to be adopted.
Send to ISE. S. On 23/07/2020 02:30, Jen Linkova wrote: > One thing to add here: the chairs would like to hear active and > explicit support of the adoption. So please speak up if you believe > the draft is useful and the WG shall work on getting it published. > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 3:35 AM Ron Bonica > <rbonica=40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> >> >> This email begins a Call For Adoption on draft-wang-opsec-tls-proxy-bp. >> >> >> >> Please send comments to op...@ietf.org by August 3, 2020. >> >> >> >> Ron >> >> >> >> >> Juniper Business Use Only >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OPSEC mailing list >> op...@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec > > > > -- > SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
