On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 8:04 PM Peter Gutmann <pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
> Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> writes: > > >The WG is not obligated to support TLS 1.2. > > Is that an official WG position, that the TLS WG has abandoned TLS 1.2? > If it > is, can I have change control over it, because if the WG doesn't want to > support it, someone will have to. > > (I'm not fussed either way, but would like to see things resolved rather > than > just being left in limbo). > The charter says "Changes or additions to older versions of (D)TLS whether via extensions or ciphersuites are discouraged and require significant justification to be taken on as work items." I would personally take that to mean "we should fix really bad bugs", but nothing more. Others may disagree. I do not think this WG should function as a "permission to use TLS 1.2" group, because TLS 1.2 shouldn't be used. ymmv, Rob
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
