On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 8:39 PM Benjamin Kaduk <bka...@akamai.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 08:27:02PM -0500, Shumon Huque wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:29 AM Ilari Liusvaara < > ilariliusva...@welho.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I noticed that the "dnssec_chain" extension in the IANA registry lists > > > only "CH" in the "TLS 1.3" column. However, the extension sends its > > > response in the certificate message (section 2.2), so I think that > > > column should read "CH, CT". > > > > > > > You are right, Ilari. > > > > What's the process to get the IANA registry corrected? > > It is probably "best" (for some definition of "best") to publish an RFC > that Updates: 9102 and has the revised directive to IANA. > Ouch! > Probably an errata report should be filed against RFC 9102 regardless. > IANA might be able to use the errata report without the updating RFC, > but you'd have to ask. > Let's see if this path works first. Shumon.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
