On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, at 7:57 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, at 22:39, Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) wrote: >> Actually, that was our original intention with this draft - to specify >> the framework, and to have other documents specify the actual pairs. >> However, I believe that the sense of the working group is that they >> want this draft to start with a limited number of options (and people, >> please correct me if I'm wrong). > > I'm saying that that is not a good idea. Drafts are cheap, and this > one is done. If that is counter to the sentiment of the working group, > then so be it.
(Chair hat on) We specifically parked this document in its current post-WGLC state to sort out the issue of codepoints, be it here or in a separate companion document. Either way, the draft is not yet done. Best, Chris > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
