The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC8446, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6205

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Martin Thomson <m...@lowentropy.net>
Date Reported: 2020-06-04
Held by: Paul Wouters (IESG)

Section: 4.3.2

Original Text
-------------
   Servers which are authenticating with a PSK MUST NOT send the
   CertificateRequest message in the main handshake, though they MAY
   send it in post-handshake authentication (see Section 4.6.2) provided
   that the client has sent the "post_handshake_auth" extension (see
   Section 4.2.6).

Corrected Text
--------------
   Servers which are authenticating with a resumption PSK MUST NOT send the
   CertificateRequest message in the main handshake, though they MAY
   send it in post-handshake authentication (see Section 4.6.2) provided
   that the client has sent the "post_handshake_auth" extension (see
   Section 4.2.6).  Servers which are authenticating with an external PSK
   MUST NOT send the CertificateRequest message either in the main handshake
   or request post-handshake authentication. Future specifications MAY
   provide an extension to permit this. 

Notes
-----
The lack of qualification on "authenticating with a PSK" implies that the 
statement applies equally to both external and resumption PSKs.  However, there 
are two conditions being governed: whether a certificate can be requested 
during the handshake, and whether a certificate can be requested 
post-handshake.  The latter of these requires different rules depending on the 
type of PSK.

We know from the analysis of resumption (see 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/TugB5ddJu3nYg7chcyeIyUqWSbA/) that 
combining a PSK handshake of either type with a client certificate is not safe. 
 Thus, the prohibition on CertificateRequest during the handshake applies 
equally to both resumption and external PSKs.

For post-handshake, Appendix E.1 already discusses the risks of combining PSKs 
with certificates, citing the same analysis as above.

   [...]  It is unsafe to use certificate-based client
   authentication when the client might potentially share the same
   PSK/key-id pair with two different endpoints.

For this reason an external PSK is not safe to use with post-handshake 
authentication.  A resumption PSK does not have this property, so the same 
prohibition doesn't apply.

Splitting the requirements as proposed makes this split clearer.

--------------------------------------
RFC8446 (draft-ietf-tls-tls13-28)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3
Publication Date    : August 2018
Author(s)           : E. Rescorla
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Transport Layer Security
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to