On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 5:25 PM Rob Sayre <say...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 1:26 PM David Benjamin <david...@chromium.org> > wrote: > >> >> I think sometimes we spend a little more energy than is actually useful >> in figuring out these implied lower bounds. :-) In practice, the only >> decision we actually care about is whether 0 is allowed, and even then it's >> often irrelevant (like here). >> > > FWIW, I find these really confusing in TLS notation. > > I usually end up checking what NSS or OpenSSL does to get the answer. So, > I don't think there's an operational problem, but it could be better. > I just mentally replace all non-zero minimums to 1 when reading. I can't think of any structure where a non-zero minimum value was not just some attempt to figure out the minimum possible byte count of a single object. David
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
