Hiya,
(I'm currently on travel so just dipping into this thread, but...) On 24/05/2024 19:15, Nick Harper wrote:
I’m replying in this separate thread to respond to some of your comments and responses around the risks related to Trust Expressions so that we can keep the primary thread focused on the technical matters.
The risks related to abuse of protocols are technical matters. It is true that we have not paid sufficient attention to those risks in the past, but we really should know better by now. On 24/05/2024 22:00, Brendan McMillion wrote: > I'll assert that many people consider eavesdropping by their own > government to be legitimate, I'll assert that many people do not consider the above legitimate, if done at scale, without court-orders etc. etc. BCP188 does not have any local-government exception so if it's the case that this draft makes such local snooping easier, then that seems like a major negative to me. Cheers, S.
OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org
