The ICAO Communication Panel has specified DTLS for air-to-ground
security. That won't change without a major lift effort, lots of years,
and for many of them QUIC is too new and unproven.
:)
Actually there are good reasons for use of CoAP over-the-air. Of course
CoAP specifies DTLS...
FUN!
Fix DTLS.
On 11/12/24 17:52, Watson Ladd wrote:
I think anyone implementing would have discovered them. The other
question which I'll try not to ask too frequently is at what point do
we just point users at QUIC?
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 12:43 PM Russ Housley <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> I agree that a bis is needed for DTLS 1.3, but I think that some of
the things that David Benjiman talked about would have been
discovered, especially the keyUpdate-related things, if there had been
formal analysis of DTLS 1.3. Please have the FATT take a look.
>
> Russ
>
>
> On Nov 12, 2024, at 3:29 PM, Joseph Salowey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> At IETF 121, we discussed revised DTLS 1.3, aka a
draft-ietf-tls-rfc9147bis. The chairs are proposing starting this I-D
as a WG item with the existing RFC as a base. If you object to this
please let the list know by 25 November 2024.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Deirdre, Joe, and Sean
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
