+1 for adoption, and not commenting on the silliness of the counterargument brought up here, because it is silly.
I do not see a security concern with having the option for pure ML-KEM in TLS. TLS has ways of negotiating algorithms, if one side believes ML-KEM to be insufficiently secure, they can negotiate 0x11EC (which equally should be adopted). On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 2:11 PM Filippo Valsorda <[email protected]> wrote: > 2024-12-07 03:19 GMT+01:00 D. J. Bernstein <[email protected]>: > > Having a company influencing IETF decisions by making claims about what > customers are demanding---with no explanation of _why_ those demands are > being made, and no opportunity for IETF review of the merits of those > rationales---is exposing IETF to antitrust litigation. > > > hahahahahahahahahahahaha > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > -- Sophie Schmieg | Information Security Engineer | ISE Crypto | [email protected]
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
