* Did you mean the number of people attending a particular meeting ? My understanding is that consensus is not determined by meeting participants; it’s always determined on the mailing list. Are you suggesting that a certain minimum percentage of mailing list subscribers have to be in favor?
Cheers, Andrei From: Quynh Dang <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2025 11:01 AM To: Andrei Popov <[email protected]> Cc: Tim Bray <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [TLS] Re: Changing WG Mail List Reputation You don't often get email from [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 1:50 PM Andrei Popov <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: In the absence of a roster of participants, how can a percentage of votes be determined? We don’t have WG membership registrations, AFAIK. Did you mean the number of people attending a particular meeting ? Requiring them to sign in using the online tools. For the people who don't sign and they attend another meeting, they can send their IETF registration for that day or for the whole week to the chairs and their votes can be cast within a week or so after the IETF ends. That would be an easy task I think and I don't think we should talk about it now. Regards, Quynh. Cheers, Andrei From: Quynh Dang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2025 10:44 AM To: Tim Bray <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [TLS] Re: Changing WG Mail List Reputation You don't often get email from [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 1:26 PM Tim Bray <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Jan 15, 2025 at 11:37:58 AM, Quynh Dang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Defining a minimum percentage of votes to have the consensus would take care of the problem and the chairs at the IETF would love that. No it wouldn’t Why do you think it wouldn't take care of the problem I described? Regards, Quynh. and no we (speaking as former co-chair of two WGs) wouldn’t. I’m not sure why we’re relitigating the works-pretty-OK process of consensus calls from the chair and potential appeals. -T
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
