Hi Mahesh, On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 at 09:44, Thomas Fossati <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, Mahesh, > > On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 at 19:24, Mahesh Jethanandani > <[email protected]> wrote: > > In this draft PR [2], I have attempted to capture the essence of the > > 'Updates'. Could you please confirm whether this would work for you? > > > > [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/f_JWgsCbxKIaDX1AcD8e47MIWUU/ > > [2] https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/101/commits/7655b19e > > > > > > Thanks for making the change. But my DISCUSS is for the lack of similar > > text in the Abstract. It does not have to provide all the explanation you > > provide in Introduction for why you are updating RFC9146, but just say that > > it updates RFC9146. > > Got it. Please see: > https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-rrc/pull/101/commits/60d527491 > > BTW, your email made me realise that the same rationale for updating > 9146 also applies to 9147, which is reflected in the commit above.
We have published -20 [1], which should address your DISCUSS. Please let us know if you are happy with the change. cheers, t [1] https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-tls-dtls-rrc-19&url2=draft-ietf-tls-dtls-rrc-20&difftype=--html _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
