Thank you for the feedback. The points below have been addressed in https://github.com/dstebila/draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design/commit/36284d90463555cba38a327c687ae0821e2788f5
Douglas > On Sep 3, 2025, at 1:09 PM, Mike Bishop via Datatracker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design-15: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-hybrid-design/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This is a solid and well-written document. Thank you. > > In Section 1, it says "Some authors prefer...." It might be useful to be clear > which authors are being referenced here -- authors of this RFC? Authors of > referenced research papers? Authors of future hybrid specifications? > > I appreciate the appendix of related work. You specifically call out one > reference as "an overview of post-quantum cryptography as of 2009," which > invites the question of why this is the best reference 16 years later. I would > either drop the date (if it's still the best overview around) or add a few > words stating that while dated, it remains a valuable resource because of > [foo]. > > > _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
