Could the chairs please ask the participants to continue this thread on another more suitable mailing list?
This is NOT what I subscribe to the TLS list for Cheers, John From: Lloyd W <[email protected]> Date: Saturday, 11 October 2025 at 15:24 To: D. J. Bernstein <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [TLS] Re: Form of Appeals (Re: Complaint to IAB regarding non-transparency) You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> On 11 Oct 2025, at 19:53, D. J. Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote: IESG's entire rationale for saying that my complaint wasn't "valid" is one sliver from your list of excuses: it boils down to the fact that at that point I wasn't using the IETF-approved text for opting out of IETF's copyright grab. This isn't my fault---it's not as if IETF warns participants about the copyright grab in the first place, never mind the buried opt-out text. https://www.ietf.org/about/note-well/ and BCP 78 are cited by the chairs in their introductory slides to every workgroup meeting, so that all participants are aware of the position on copyright. but you don't participate in the meetings, do you? I think your continued comments would be more convincing if they were more truthful. And shorter. Much shorter. Lloyd Wood
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
