Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> writes: > The current document has Recommended=N for *all* the algorithms. Above, I > proposed changing them to Y, which would also entail changing the document > to be Proposed Standard. We've now heard a number of counterproposals, > including (1) leave as-is (2) just mark X25519 Y (3) take out the NIST > curves. > > At this point it's not clear to me that any of these has consensus, so that > chairs need to work that out. However, given that there have been a number > of objections to (3), I doubt very much that that would pass WGLC (and I, > at least, would object to it.).
Do you have any technical argument against separating the widely deployed X25519MLKEM768 (which I believe ought to be StandardsTrack/Recommended=Y) from the more marginal NIST curves (which I believe are more appropriate as Informational/Recommended=N)? /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
