In case it helps to relate the two set of comments ...
On 27.10.25 03:54, Aijun Wang wrote:
But, as indicated by Usama and replied by Mohit, the detail procedures in Figure 2 of this document should be based on TLS 1.3https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8446#section-2 If there is any misunderstanding due to the above ignorance, let's discuss further based on our future update based on TLS 1.3
I agree with Ekr's comments and you should address his comments first. The way I see it is in the following order:
1. Address Ekr's points "Third" and "Overall", i.e., first justify why TLS handshake is the right way to do it. 2. Address my point, i.e., move the design to TLS 1.3 3. Address Ekr's points "First" and "Second", i.e., use PSK-based handshake in TLS 1.3In other words, you should not move to TLS 1.3 before justifying why it should be done at the TLS layer.
-Usama
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
