On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 09:47:08AM -0700, Watson Ladd wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2025, 9:03 AM Nico Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 03:54:11PM +0000, Kampanakis, Panos wrote: > > > Good idea. Option (f) could be an erratum that calls out EdDSA and > > > ML-DSA as examples of "built-in digest signatures" in X.509 that fall > > > under the non MD-5/SHA-1 hash bullet of RFC 5929. > > > > Is that truly an erratum? I think an update is in order. (Who shall do > > that work?) > > I volunteer. I think once we finish this thread it's a pretty > straightforward though tedious exercise in copypasta to write what we wrote.
Thanks! _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
