Paul, Based on John’s email can we mark this one as HFDU?
spt > On May 10, 2017, at 16:15, John Gilmore <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree that the erratum is an editorial, not technical, change. > > It is a slight improvement on the current wording, but is in no way > required for interoperability, since the same information is available > at the source already cited in the paragraph (the TLS ExtensionType > Values subregistry at IANA). > > I recommend that we keep it in the editorial queue for folding > in if/when the RFC is ever revised for other reasons. > > John _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
