On 24/11/2025 23:24, Salz, Rich wrote:
We kind of did that implicitly, by marking one as RECOMMENDED Y and the other as N.
For me, RECOMMENDED=N doesn't provide a specific enough signal to cover this particular case where publishing an RFC even with that might well disimprove Internet security.
Also - what happened to the adopt-but-park plan? Did that get lost in the fog of appeals?I thought there was a ruling that adopt-and-park wasn’t a legit action for the extant call for adoption.
You can ignore that - I was confused myself at the time but Watson quickly put me right. Cheers, S.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
