Hi,I was too occupied with BoF in Madrid and couldn't do justice with this draft in my presentation.
We have started documenting some of our pain points and propose some potential solutions. To be clear, we are NOT asserting that other stakeholders in FATT process do not have pain points. We believe they do have as well (which is an indication that the process needs some revision). But being unable to contact FATT and being unable to present at WG meetings puts us at unnecessarily great disadvantage and delays the analysis to propose potential solutions in a timely fashion.
If you have read -00, section 3 [0] is the main new thing. Shouldn't be more than a 5-minutes read. The rest attempts to address some of the feedback.
We appreciate any feedback and will try to address it in the next version until the cutoff.
-Usama[0] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-usama-tls-fatt-extension-01.html#section-3
-------- Forwarded Message --------Subject: New Version Notification for draft-usama-tls-fatt-extension-01.txt
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 11:04:48 -0800 From: [email protected]To: Muhammad Sardar <[email protected]>, Muhammad Usama Sardar <[email protected]>
A new version of Internet-Draft draft-usama-tls-fatt-extension-01.txt has been
successfully submitted by Muhammad Usama Sardar and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-usama-tls-fatt-extension Revision: 01 Title: Extensions to TLS FATT Process Date: 2026-01-07 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 8 URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-usama-tls-fatt-extension-01.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-usama-tls-fatt-extension/ HTML: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-usama-tls-fatt-extension-01.htmlHTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-usama-tls-fatt-extension Diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-usama-tls-fatt-extension-01
Abstract: This document applies only to non-trivial extensions of TLS, which require formal analysis. It proposes the authors provide a threat model and informal security goals in the Security Considerations section, and a protocol diagram in the draft. We also briefly present a few pain points of the one doing the formal analysis which require refining the process: * Contacting FATT * Understanding the opposing goals * No response from some authors * Slots at meeting The IETF Secretariat
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
