Hello,
Thank you for the review. We addressed first two comments here:
https://github.com/tlswg/tls-ecdhe-mlkem/pull/60
Regarding the last comment:
All three registrations are for "TLS Supported Groups" and include:
Recommended: N
The IANA table TLS Supported Groups
(https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters/tls-parameters.xhtml#tls-parameters-8)
describes "Recommended" with:
If the "Recommended" column is set to "N", it does not necessarily
mean that it is flawed; rather, it indicates that the item either
has not been through the IETF consensus process, has limited
applicability, or is intended only for specific use cases. [...]
However, it appears that once the document is approved, these three
key exchange systems will quality for "Recommended: Y", as they will
have IETF consensus, appear to be secure "in the post-quantum world",
and are FIPS-approved (when used properly). If "Recommended: N" is
intended, some explanation for this (e.g., the limits of
applicability) should be provided.
The "Recommended" field has been discussed at length on the mailing list. I
believe the consensus was to
set it to 'N'; therefore, I have not changed this option at this point.
Kind regards,
Kris
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
