Nico Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > That's disingeneous. I am not proposing that we have a protocol police. > I'm proposing that when one player uses their market share to force an > unwritten change to our RFCs on implementors without any public > discussion, then we ought to use what leverage we have (e.g., a > statement by the IAB) to object.
It is not disingenuous, and there is no "we" on this point. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8962.html#section-1 The document is an April 1 RFC, but it does directly address this point. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
