On Wed, Apr 8, 2026, 1:26 PM Rob Sayre <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2026 at 12:41 PM D. J. Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > 1) The IEEE group wants an RFC. They can advocate for this just as >> > anyone else can. (yes!) >> > > ... > > >> >> This rule isn't merely about who's allowed to respond to last calls. >> It's about _all_ participation in a WG. >> > > ... > > It's interesting. I think we agree on the technical point, or at least > it's pretty close. > > But I don't do appeals unless they are sure to be rejected, so they are > just graffiti. >
Groucho Marxism? Or a typo? (For benefit of those unfamiliar with Groucho he is said to have resigned from the Friars Club of Beverly Hills saying he didn't want to be a member of any club that would accept people like him.) > The reason is that appeals lend legitimacy to the broken process and bad > decision making. > Surely if an appeal is sustained then it fixes it? I've seen this happen where iirc the chairs just got confused and the appeal straightened it all out. > This will just be another busted WiFi encryption standard if we are right. > If we're wrong, well, good. > > thanks, > Rob > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Astra mortemque praestare gradatim
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
