-super-jumbo-record-limit completed WGLC back in November. There were some edits that were made as a result of WGLC and a new version has been submitted; see [1]. Assuming this version addresses the WGLC comments, the document would be ready to proceed.
During the Shepherd write-up process, Hannes noted that there are two implementations but that he did both of them; Mbed TLS and WolfSSL. Two questions: 1. Does anybody else have, know of, or have plans for an implementation of -super-jumbo-record-limit? 2. If the answer to #1 is no, are we okay with progressing the document? Cheers, TLS Chairs - Deirdre, Joe, & Sean [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-super-jumbo-record-limit/ _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
