Hi, I’d like to echo Muhammad here. The initial “This is not correct”, followed by a handwavy reference to an entire different mailing list and “10+ years of analysis” when challenged, is unhelpful.
Nadim Kobeissi Symbolic Software • https://symbolic.software > On 10 Apr 2026, at 9:55 PM, Deirdre Connolly <[email protected]> wrote: > > See all of pqc-forum and the 10+ years of analysis of Kyber and ML-KEM inthe > literature including its proposed use in protocols for 'analysis' > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2026, 12:52 PM Muhammad Usama Sardar > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> Hi Deirdre, >> >> On 10.04.26 21:41, Deirdre Connolly wrote: >> > > Moreover, PQ/T hybrids have received significantly more analysis and >> > deployment experience than the standalone post-quantum counterparts. >> > >> > This is not correct. >> >> IMHO just saying that is neither sufficient nor productive. A productive >> discussion should explain technically what is not correct in this >> statement, or alternatively please present your statement (so that I can >> refute 🙂). >> >> Best regards, >> >> -Usama >> > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
