Hi Usama,
At 04:33 PM 25-04-2026, Muhammad Usama Sardar wrote:
I am not familiar with this term. I did a quick search but I don't
find in IETF context.
Here's an example of a review:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/Cuv72NQhs_04FlL6F7NL79gX5qc/
More importantly, could you please elaborate your rationale behind
distinguishing 'design team' or 'review group' for the purposes of
my proposal? Unless I am missing some subtlety, it seems completely
orthogonal to my proposal. So I will leave this for some senior for guidance.
I looked for what might be a closer fit based on what I read in RFC 2418.
Please see [3], which has links to reports, e.g., see thorough
report [4] by Britta Hale for 8773bis. In my proposal, the effort of
FATT will be distributed over time, and Verifier will be able to do
most of the effort under their guidance and FATT will be able to
focus on review.
Thanks for the URL.
I may be misunderstanding your point here. I believe everybody --
and not just Verifier -- in the IETF is a volunteer.
I cannot speak for other Verifiers. I can speak only for myself. I
am willing to do the job for free because this is my job description
and I am funded by the German Research Foundation ("Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft"). I have fully transparently declared it in
Acknowledgment section of my draft [6].
The point is that I keep in mind that the reviewer is a volunteer.
We may be talking past each other. I believe any reasonable
comparison of my proposal
Yes (to the first sentence).
should be with the current process. Could you please clarify why
this is an additional risk in my proposal compared to the current process?
It's not about risk. It's about finding common ground.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
