Dear Sean, On 28.04.26 23:24, Stephen Farrell wrote:
On 28/04/2026 21:24, Sean Turner wrote:Hi! The chairs have judged that there is consensus to progress this I-D.Well, that's a terse summary of a surprising conclusion. (And not even 'rough'?) I think it'd be good to understand the chairs' reasoning as to why the various objections have been sufficiently deal with.
I have read recent exchanges in the thread again, checked the repo and I share Stephen's concerns. It would be helpful to understand the rationale of how several concerns have been addressed to consensus. I am specially concerned because PR [0] for statement on composites has not even been merged, as of now.
Best regards, -Usama [0] https://github.com/tlswg/tls-mldsa/pull/32
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
