"David U." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I'll take a look at it.  I would guess there are two ways of
> handling it.
>
> 1) exec'ing an outside program or script on the message before it
> goes out

This method seems slightly less reliable.  e.g, would the outside
script be able to properly sign a MIME/Multipart message?

> 2) building gpg support into tmda-inject with something like:
> http://py-gnupg.sourceforge.net/ (GnuPGInterface Python module)

I'd be more in favour of this, since it seems cleaner, and would be
easy to add an `application/pgp-signature' (or whatever MIME
content-type is appropriate for GnuPG sigs) part to the outgoing
message.  The tmda-inject in CVS has the machinery to do this fairly
easily.

> It looks like the python module is a pretty complete wrapper for
> gpg.

I wasn't aware of this module, but this will certainly make things
easier.

> I'll look at some python code this week and see if I can grok the
> gpg module and then see where we are.

Sounds good.

BTW, further discussions on developmental issues of this sort should
take place on tmda-workers.

> Most likely though, this will be too difficult for me to tackle
> without some more time with the language.

Don't sweat it.  Unless you urgently need this feature, I'll get
around to it sooner or later.
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users

Reply via email to