> Handling other TMDA messages is easy because the format is controlled > and understood, but should it try to automatically cope with all the > one-time address schemes out there?
No. I am not advocating that. > That seems like an enormous amount of work for relatively little gain. Agreed. What I am pushing for is that we build a consortium of interested parties, for the group to develop an RFC, and for that RFC to some day become a standard. Then we just have to modify the code to act according to the standard and we can play well with every package that also adheres to the standard. I'm sorry if I didn't make that clear before. > TMDA "whitelists" are flat text files with a simple and easily > understood format. You could just write a simple CGI script for your > webserver that lets users read/write their whitelists. Agreed. That would be the easiest short-term solution. But I still think the best long-term solution is a standard. Gre7g. ================================================================= Gre7g Luterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.templeofluna.com/ Stay informed: http://www.templeofluna.com/keeper/mailinglist.htm It's sad that a family can be torn apart by something as simple ...as a pack of wild dogs. _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
