"Richard Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=pinky.notnet.co.uk) > by gateway.home.gotworms.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) > id 18a6Ax-0003sG-00 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 03:31:11 +0000 > Received: from [81.91.102.5] (helo=mail.anlx.net) > by pinky.notnet.co.uk with esmtp (TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168) > id 18a61q-0001vw-00 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 03:21:46 +0000 > Received: from www.funmail.co.uk ([212.62.7.9] helo=mx.another.com) > by mail.anlx.net with smtp id 18a5zC-00072K-00 > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 > 03:19:02 +0000
These are the header fields that matter. At the bottom, mail.anlx.net receives mail for richard-confirm-blah. I'm not sure I understand the next one up... it says it received the mail from mail.anlx.net for pobk. Is that where fetchmail retrieves it, by chance? Finally, fetchmail (running on localhost) passes it to Exim for richard. Nothing else. > so it appears that fetchmail is not molesting stuff as previously thought... I don't agree. It looks like fetchmail destroyed the address when handing it off to Exim. At least, it appears so from the most recent Received field. Try searching the tmda-users archives. I know this has been discussed before and there are people using fetchmail with TMDA, so you should be able to solve it. Tim _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
