>Your HTML was not readable in my mailreader, which is usually >pretty good at that kind of thing. Perhaps you could try again in >plain text. > >db
Let me try again, I accidentally sent it in HTML format... Currently we have a larger mail system but only 500 mailboxes have tmda installed. We are using qmail. Python (specifically TMDA) seems to thrash the CPU when it is called. This is not specifically horrible but is a concern if the number of mailboxes reaches thousands or more. I am currently using plain text lists and am wondering if using CDB would clear up the problem or at least make it considerably better. Is there currently any good documentation on going from a plain text type of situation to using CDB for the list files? I am also using tmda-cgi which installes TMDA on a mailbox so any info on how to get tmda-cgi to install using CDB instead of plain text files. Also, is it practical to think this would really help much? Could there be another way to minimize the "thrashing" of the cpu? We currently use qmailscanner also, written in perl, which scans every single email and the processing time and load overall is far less than what python is taking (tmda). Considering that the qmailscanner is doing hundreds per second when TMDA is doing a couple per second tmda is something to look at. Sam _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
