Also, I *think* you mean that if the SA score was <= 0. Having all the spammers whitelisted somehow seems like it would defeat the whole purpose.
BISHOP Micha�l wrote:
I don't know whether there would be terribly much demand for this, and since we're in feature-freeze it would be post-1.0 regardless. Nonetheless, I thought I'd toss out the idea for comment and possible noting future use.
On the outgoing filter, we have the action bare=append, which obviously leaves the e-mail unchanged, but adds the recipient to a list (we presume a whitelist....) provided that the rule's criteria are met. I think it would be handy to have something equivalent in the incoming filter. For example, something like "ok=append".
There are certain criteria that, so far as the e-mail I receive goes, mean a person is not a spam-threat. For example, say they get a flat zero (or negative) SA score -- I'd be impressed by a spammer who managed that, frankly. I have a rule that lets such mail through without confirmation -- but that means future e-mails may still be subject to confirmation if they creep a wee bit higher. In any case, they receive dated addresses on my reply. It would be nice to have that rule, in effect, say that if a person *ever* sent me something with a SA score >= 0, their mail passes.
Anyone else think that would be useful?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
_____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
