Date: Fri Dec 26 15:12:39 EST 2003
Sndr: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Linux Advisory Watch - December 26th 2003
Actn: CONFIRM action_incoming (9675)
--
Date: Fri Dec 26 15:12:39 EST 2003
Sndr: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Linux Advisory Watch - December 26th 2003
Actn: CONFIRM pending 1072469559.12878.msg (9675)
--
Date: Fri Dec 26 15:12:39 EST 2003
Sndr: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Linux Advisory Watch - December 26th 2003
Actn: NOREPLY (Precedence: bulk) (9675)
And the email (inline) is:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from juggernaut.guardiandigital.com (ns.guardiandigital.com [209.11.107.5])
by blue-labs.org (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBQKCYka012843
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 15:12:34 -0500
Received: from juggernaut.guardiandigital.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 892B244F3C; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 15:10:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list vuln-newsletter); Fri, 26 Dec 2003 15:04:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E3944DF5
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 15:04:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from juggernaut.guardiandigital.com ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (juggernaut.guardiandigital.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 13150-01 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Fri, 26 Dec 2003 15:04:15 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 15:04:14 -0500 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux Advisory Watch - December 26th 2003
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at guardiandigital.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-archive-position: 136
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
X-list: vuln-newsletter
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
jaymale.blue-labs.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_REAL_NAME
autolearn=no version=2.60
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.2 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name
* -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
* [score: 0.0000]
* 0.3 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment
X-TMDA-Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[body]
I'm thinking it has something to do with the assumed recipient which is incorrect. I should probably strip out the prior Delivered-To header and replace it with the current Delivered-To data which is my address. After you get this email, I'm going to edit the queue file and try that.
Tim Legant wrote:
David Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have manually accepted it (not whitelisted for a reason yet..), and
it sits in the queue for hours still as "marked messages are being
processed....", then it reappears as a new mail. I have quite a bit
of email flow through my account, so I know that tmda is running quite
often.
This sounds like you're talking about tmda-cgi (the quoted message is in the browser)? What versions of TMDA and tmda-cgi are you running?
There is nothing in the debug log about it and nothing abnormal in the
incoming log. It comes in "new" and a confirm message is sent.
Does the incoming log get updated every time the message re-appears as "new" in tmda-cgi? Or is there just one log entry from the first time the message arrived at your machine?
Anyone is free to inspect the email, it's from the above list, dated
12/26. Past emails from this address do the same thing. Silent
failures... I wish tmda wasn't so silent about things.
Could you send me a copy? I have an idea what the problem is but I could be way off, so I'd like to make a few tests.
Thanks,
Tim
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
_____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
