--> Tuesday, February 3, 2004, 12:44:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 2004-02-03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] penned: >> >> Dated addresses were something that caught my eye first of all, but >> now I find they are secondary to others in my scheme. >> >> I feel I need more information on their suggested lifetime in order to >> incorporate them as best as possible into my system. >>
> This is highly dependent on where you use the dated address. > If you use it on usenet (newsgroups) or mailing lists with web archives, > expect it to be compromised more or less immediately. Yes of course, bad wording on my part. I am talking about the turnaround time between compromise and receipt of spam. I understand that the address itself is generally harvested more or less immediately. Additionally, to clarify, I am referring to use in broad public forums. I imagine, out of thin air, that 1 to 3 days might work. But really, I don't know. Is 3 days too much, I don't know. I assume a week is. Maybe people have already experienced immediate spam on addresses with a one day lifetime. I think that is the primary possibility I worry about. What are your experiences with various dated address lifetimes? _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
