In my first mail I postet the header from the mail and the logfileentry from tmda -
what more do you need to know?
And how I can get the infos you need...
If the sender answers the mail only a new confirmationrequest is sent back to him...
Andreas
Heres what I posted bevor:
Example:
<Logfile from TMDA>
Date: Fri Jul 2 12:07:06 CEST 2004
From: AT-FM KPMG Express Accounting News
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?WG=3A_EAN_04/19_IFRS=3A_Zus=E4tzliches_Info-Ser?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?vice_-_IFRS_in_Brief?=
Actn: CONFIRM action_incoming (134813)
Date: Fri Jul 2 12:07:06 CEST 2004
From: AT-FM KPMG Express Accounting News
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?WG=3A_EAN_04/19_IFRS=3A_Zus=E4tzliches_Info-Ser?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?vice_-_IFRS_in_Brief?=
Actn: CONFIRM pending 1088762826.4893.msg (134813)
</Logfile from TMDA>
<Mailheader>
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 4889 invoked by uid 504); 2 Jul 2004 10:07:04 -0000
Received: from outsourced.at (HELO w1.outsourced.at) (212.183.22.34)
by 212.183.22.38 with SMTP; 2 Jul 2004 10:07:04 -0000
Received: from mailgw3.kpmg.at (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by w1.outsourced.at (8.12.3/8.12.2/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i62A6PBl021306
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:06:48 +0200
Received: from atlnzexc01.at.kworld.kpmg.com (unverified) by mailgw3.kpmg.at
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.12) with ESMTP id
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 2
Jul 2004 12:05:44 +0200
Received: by atlnzexc01.at.kworld.kpmg.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2657.72) id <M3ZA0SYJ>; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:06:14 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: AT-FM KPMG Express Accounting News
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?WG=3A_EAN_04/19_IFRS=3A_Zus=E4tzliches_Info-Ser?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?vice_-_IFRS_in_Brief?=
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 12:06:03 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_000_01C4601C.2EFE3920"
X-TMDA-Recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
</Mailheader>
-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jason R. Mastaler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 08. August 2004 04:22
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: From line split to two lines... Update!
"Andreas Plachy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh... this seems the be a bug in TMDA. Like in RFC822 defined
> mailheaderfields CAN be split in two lines.
Folded, yes. Folded is not really the same thing as "split". AFAIK,
TMDA can handle any properly folded header line.
You'll have to provide more info though, like the traceback TMDA is
producing, and the raw text of the message that is causing it.
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
