Quoting Webmaster - ITServ GmbH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > This sounds like a specific case of a feature I requested several months > ago. > > On the outgoing filter, there is a "bare=append" action which says that > the > > recipient of a message meeting certain criteria recieves the e-mail > unaltered > > and is added to the whitelist. This is most generally used to > auto-whitelist > > anyone you address e-mail to. > > ...which I don't use. I currently do not see any benefit in tagging outgoing > mail. I have to read some more docs to understand what tagging this mail > brings back to me.
Consider the dated address you replied to -- TMDA generates that when it sends my message. You aren't whitelisted on my system, and I'm not using the bare=append option to add you. But with that dated in my outgoing filter, it will automatically generate a reply-to that's valid for a few days. > > My request was for an incoming filter rule, say "ok=append", which does > the same > > thing for an incoming message. Meeting certain criteria, the sender is > > auto-whitelisted and the message passes. It becomes just another action > in > > your incoming filter, albeit the only one which affects the list files. > > > > It's not implemented yet, but it's on the TODO list for the 1.1 versions. > Is > > this something like what you're after? > > Yes, exactly. That would bet *it*. > > I got an advice that I could pass mails by adding something like > > body 'some match code' ok > > to my input filter, but this leads to the problem that all mail is passed, > even if 'some match code' is not included in the mail. I think I made > something wrong, but did not have the time to analyse it. You might check what your default action is if something gets past every line of the filter. Also, try turning on the X-TMDA-Action header so that you'll see what line of the filter approved each message. _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
