I thought it may be of interest that AT&T is using tmda to confirm e-mail addresses sent to their [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address. Personally, I don't use confirm addresses going to my postmaster & abuse accounts and have never received spam going to either of those addresses. Is this an a-typical setup for TMDA usage?
Niles
------------------------------
Message: 2 Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:26:22 -0700 (PDT) From: David Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Is it really TMDA, or a look-alike?
Either way, it's not unheard of.
It's appears to be TMDA judging by the Message ID.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message: 3 Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:02:25 -0400 (EDT) From: "Tom Moulton tmda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: AT&T using TMDA To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Interesting, that may be a ploy to only deal with people and not SpamCop reports, kinda shame... (ok that's a totally different topic...)
I thought it was kind of lame myself, since this address is only for submitting abuse claims. Guess it says something about how many complaints they receive Niles
_____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
