-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Godmar Back wrote: | If the assumption is that existing users of your email address should | be able to continue to use the same address - a completely reasonable | assumption - then indeed burdening these users with C/R would often be | unreasonable. I can see that it would lead to users who would not | understand why they can't send you email all the sudden when they | could before. (Indeed, then you'd need some kind of | whitelisting/priming of your whitelist.)
Before I started using TMDA, I whitelisted email addresses from several years of past incoming email. I discovered later that TMDA has a tool for doing this.
| BTW, I do agree that current content-based anti-spam systems are very | effective (I just use gmail's and it has few false negatives and | hardly any false positives.) But token-based email could provide the | additional benefit of helping you prioritize the email you read, aside | from simply blocking spam.
My Gmail account has not received any real spam. I've had to fish three false positives out of its spam catcher. Since I use the account so little, I'm probably not a good model.
Kyle. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBSylYzS7R/flctWYRAgpEAJ4nvVjqI5v5wIhrvkj9JbWYfahflwCfTGj1 CNCzHzWulPRNR/6YybXyp6Q= =zU8D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _____________________________________________ tmda-users mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
