On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:06:58AM -0800, Terry Turner wrote:
> if i merely reply then tom will have my real, untagged address.
Is there a problem with tom having your real, untagged address?
As long as it's protected by TMDA, it shouldn't matter, should it?
> i'd
> like to reply using the originally generated keyword address. is
> there a way to do that automatically? that is, without adding a rule
> to my filters/outgoing.
No. I don't think you can do both. You can do automatically or
you can do it w/out adding to your outgoing filter. But I think
automatically will require adding something to your outgoing filter.
Here are the options that I'm aware of:
1) If you want to do it automatically, you have to add
something to your outgoing filters file.
2) If you don't want to add it to your outgoing filter
you can add an X-TMDA header when you're sending the email
and then tmda-sendmail will follow those instructions.
But this is a manual rather than an automatic process.
I can think of no way that TMDA can do what you're asking.
It has to somehow know that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is equivalent
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] And it has to know that you want
[EMAIL PROTECTED] treated in a special way. I think the only
way that TMDA can know that is if you tell it. You can tell it
manually by using the X-TMDA header or automatically by adding
something to the outgoing filter.
$.02
- Mark
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list ([email protected])
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
